Fear of missing out, or FOMO, may be helping to drive stock-market gains as major indexes rebound from 2022 lows set in mid-June — but investor angst over potentially missing the “bottom” is usually misplaced, a strategist argued in a Tuesday note.
“Many investors insist on buying early so that they ‘can be there at the bottom.’ Yet history suggests that it’s better to be late than early,” wrote Dan Suzuki, deputy chief investment officer at Richard Bernstein Advisors.
The S&P 500
remains in a bear market but has rallied more than 17% off its June 16 close at 3666.77, leaving it a little over 10% below its Jan. 3 record finish at 4796.56. The large-cap benchmark has scored four consecutive weekly gains and ended Tuesday at its highest since late April as it attempted to overcome resistance at its 200-day moving average near 4,326.
The broader rally, which has seen the Nasdaq Composite
exit bear-market territory and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
pare its year-to-date loss to less than 7%, has appeared to attract some investors scrambling to play catch-up.
“Investor sentiment has gone from being very poor in June and July, with investor positioning also being light, to now talk of FOMO and a Goldilocks outcome,” said Jason Draho, head of asset allocation for the Americas at UBS Global Wealth Management, in a note earlier this week.
Draho warned that investors “becoming more optimistic in the current highly uncertain environment does make the markets more vulnerable to negative news.”
Whether mid-June marked the bottom will only be clear in hindsight. RBA’s Suzuki said an analysis of performance around past bear-market troughs shows that being fully in the market at the bottom isn’t as important as many investors might think.
The chart below reflects the findings, which showed that in seven of the last ten bear markets, it was better to be late than early.
Richard Bernstein Advisors
“Not only does this tend to improve returns while drastically reducing downside potential, but this approach also gives one more time to assess incoming fundamental data. Because if it’s not based on fundamentals, it’s just guessing,” Suzuki wrote.
What about the exceptions?
Suzuki noted that the only instances in the past 70 years where it had been better to be early occurred in 1982, 1990 and 2020. “But in each of those instances, the Fed had already been cutting interest rates,” he said. “Given the high likelihood that the Fed will continue to tighten into already slowing earnings growth, it seems premature to be significantly increasing equity exposure today.”